The family of the late Ibadan political powerbroker, Lamidi Ariyibi Adedibu, and filmmaker Seun Oloketuyi are locked in a dispute over Adedibu: Alagbara Ibadan, a biographical film about the politician’s life and career.
The family has demanded the film’s removal, a public apology, and ₦500 million in damages, alleging it was produced without consent and contains false, damaging portrayals of Adedibu.
|
|
However, Mr Oloketuyi has rejected the allegations and refused to withdraw the production, maintaining that it draws on information already in the public domain.
Mr Oloketuyi produced the film through Ultimate Communications, and Abiodun Jimoh directed it.
|
|
|
|---|
Promotional materials announced a premiere on the Libra TV YouTube channel on 4 October. However, legal correspondence from both sides said a video titled Adedibu Latest Movie 2026 was published on 3 October.
The production chronicles Mr Adedibu’s life, political rise, relationships and influence in Oyo State.
Documents seen by PREMIUM TIMES on Sunday show that the dispute began shortly after the film became publicly available.
Stay Ahead with Premium Times
Follow us on Google News and never miss breaking stories, investigations, and in-depth reporting.
Add as a preferred source on Google
Family’s grievance
In a letter dated 5 October to the manager and producer of Libra Channel, Blossom Chambers said she was acting for the administrators and administratrix of Mr Adedibu’s estate and his family.
The lawyers alleged that the filmmakers produced and published the film without consulting the family or securing its consent.
They accused the filmmakers of presenting what they described as “grave untruths, fabrications and sensational falsehoods” about Adedibu’s private life and political career.
According to the letter, the family objected to the film’s portrayal of Mr Adedibu’s early years, bedroom, family, private life and personal lifestyle, which it said presented him as morally depraved.
It also disputed allegations in the film that he rigged elections through violence, practised “amala politics” to enslave the people of Ibadan and was a “puppet of doom.”
The family described those portrayals as malicious distortions of Mr Adedibu’s political activities and participation as a grassroots mobiliser.
The lawyers said the filmmakers neither interviewed family members nor accessed its archives. They also alleged that images, voice recordings and private family photographs were used without permission.
Family’s demands
The family consequently demanded the immediate removal of the film, including its excerpts, clips and reuploads, from YouTube and other social-media platforms.
It also asked the producer to preserve all raw footage, sources, and scripts, and to refrain from producing another documentary, film, skit, or social-media post about Mr Adedibu without the estate’s administrators’ written consent.
The lawyers further demanded that the filmmaker publish a three-minute apology on the same YouTube channel, pin it for 30 days, and publish another apology in the Nigerian Tribune within seven days.
They demanded ₦500 million as aggravated damages for what they described as an invasion of privacy, false light and injury to the family’s reputation.
The family gave the producer 48 hours from receiving the letter to comply. It threatened to submit privacy and defamation complaints to YouTube, petition the Inspector-General of Police’s Cybercrime Unit and institute an action at the Oyo State High Court if he failed to do so.
It said the proposed court action would seek ₦1 billion in damages and a perpetual injunction against the filmmaker, his agents and privies.
Filmmaker rejects claims
In a response dated 7 October, the producer’s lawyers, ASALAW LP, rejected the family’s allegations and demands.
The law firm said the family’s letter did not identify a specific statement in the film that was allegedly false or provide timestamps and evidence contradicting any of the disputed portrayals.
“The video referred to by you is a retelling of the public life and political career of a man who, by every account, was one of the most prominent, most discussed and most documented political figures in the history of Ibadan, Oyo State and South-West Nigeria,” the lawyers wrote.
They maintained that newspapers and magazines had previously reported the events portrayed in the film, and that books, academic publications, broadcast programmes, documentaries, and public debates had discussed them.
“Every fact depicted in the video is in the public domain,” the response stated.
The producer’s lawyers argued that Nigerian law generally does not require filmmakers to obtain permission from a deceased public figure’s relatives before producing a historical or political account of that person.
They, however, distinguished family consent from any copyright or proprietary rights that might exist over individual photographs, recordings or other protected materials.
They said the production used materials obtained from publicly accessible sources to compile a historical account of matters already in the public record.
They also argued that the family had not identified any photograph, recording or other material over which it held an enforceable proprietary right.
The lawyers rejected the privacy claims, maintaining that the film focused on Adedibu’s public career and political conduct rather than the private data of his surviving relatives.
They said the film did not publish the family members’ addresses, contact details, identity numbers, medical records or comparable private information.
The producer’s lawyers also disputed the family’s standing to sue for the alleged defamation of a deceased person, arguing that none of the contested statements referred personally to the surviving relatives.
The producer’s lawyers maintain these arguments, and a court has not tested or determined them.
Open offer
Despite rejecting the removal and compensation demands, the filmmakers offered the family an opportunity to identify any information it considered inaccurate.
The producer’s lawyers asked the family to provide, within seven days, the precise statements being disputed, their timestamps, their alleged meanings and documentary evidence showing that they were false.
They also requested proof that the lawyers had the authority and legal standing to act for all those identified as their clients.
The filmmakers said any specific and properly supported complaint would be considered in good faith but warned that they would defend the production against any legal action.
They further said they would submit a counter-notification if the family lodged a complaint with YouTube.
According to the response, the producer would seek compensation for lost revenue, audience, goodwill and reputational damage if the film were removed based on what he considered untrue assertions.
NFVCB approval
The National Film and Video Censors Board subsequently classified and approved the film.
A classification certificate issued by the NFVCB and seen by PREMIUM TIMES identifies the title as Adedibu, names Mr Oloketuyi as its producer and rates it 15, meaning it is not suitable for viewers below that age.
The certificate, numbered 061286, was dated 8 October, four days after the advertised premiere and three days after the family’s demand letter.
The NFVCB requires films and video works to be classified before their distribution or public exhibition in Nigeria.
The certificate establishes the film’s regulatory classification and approval. It does not, however, determine the separate dispute over the accuracy of its content, ownership of the materials used or the family’s legal claims.
Producer issues public notice
In a separate public notice, Ultimate Communications addressed claims circulating online that it had solicited money to produce the biopic.
The company denied requesting funds from any person or organisation before or after the production and described any contrary claim as false and misleading.
It said the material containing the allegations had been documented and referred to its lawyers, who would consider appropriate legal action against anyone publishing or circulating allegedly defamatory claims about the company.
Ultimate Communications described Adedibu: Alagbara Ibadan as a tribute to an iconic political figure and said it was created to share his story.
READ ALSO:
The company also said it held Adedibu’s family in high esteem and did not intend to engage it in a public dispute on social media.
The production
The biopic stars veteran actor Lere Paimo as Adedibu.
READ ALSO: Regina Daniels reveals why she’s celebrating her 25th birthday in wheelchair
Its cast also includes Adekola Tijani, Taiwo Ibikunle, Segun Arinze, Afeez Oyetoro, Anike Ami, Shushu Abubakar and Kayode Olaiya.
Mr Oloketuyi first announced the project in 2022 to document the lives of notable Nigerians and preserve aspects of the country’s political history.
Mr Adedibu died on 11 June 2008. He was one of Oyo State’s most influential and controversial political figures and was widely described as the “strongman of Ibadan politics.”
His influence over political contests and the Peoples Democratic Party’s structure in Oyo State made him a prominent figure in Nigeria’s political history.
Discover more from Premium Times Nigeria
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
More News
